MQSA Requirements for the Mammography Equipment
Evaluations (MEE)
When a
mammography facility installs new radiographic equipment (x-ray
units or processors), the new equipment must be evaluated by a
qualified medical physicist
and the accreditation requirements
of the facility’s accreditation body must be met before the unit is
placed into service
(21 CFR 900.12(e)(10)). In this context, “new” means “new to the
facility” and, therefore, includes used equipment. Mammography
equipment evaluations must also be performed whenever equipment is
disassembled and then reassembled at the same or a new location or
whenever a major component is changed or repaired. The MEE is
required even if a full survey has recently been completed to verify
that all functions, which may have been affected by the change or
repair, have been successfully restored.
Scope of the MEE
With respect to testing of the
equipment, the MEE is more extensive than the survey. It may be
regarded as an “acceptance” test for the equipment and an annual
survey alone is not sufficient to meet this requirement. The MEE
must address all applicable requirements under the equipment section
of the regulations (21 CFR 900.12(b)) as well as all applicable QC
requirements and testing under 21 CFR 900.12(e), including
applicable daily, weekly, quarterly, semiannual, and annual QC
tests. Such testing is only applicable to the specific equipment
that is repaired, replaced, re-assembled, or added and it is not
applicable to other equipment in the facility that has not been
affected.
- For a newly installed or
re-assembled x-ray unit, the medical physicist must:
- Perform all the annual tests listed in
section (e)(5) [except (e)(5)(viii), which need not be
included if the new unit is not the first one to be
accredited in the facility unless new cassettes are being
added], the “other modality” tests listed in section (e)(6)
(if applicable), the phantom image test listed in section
(e)(2), the compression force test listed in section
(e)(4)(iii); and
- Verify that the new x-ray unit meets
the equipment standards listed in sections (b)(1-10).
Furthermore, if the new unit is the first and/or the only
one at the facility, then Sections (b)(11), (b)(12),
(b)(14), and (b)(15), which relate to the screen-film
combination and the lighting and viewing conditions used at
the facility, respectively, must also be verified.
- For a newly installed or
reassembled processor, the medical physicist must
perform the following tests/tasks:
- Sensitometric strip as described in 21
CFR 900.12(e)(1)
- Phantom image quality as described in
21 CFR 900.12(e)(2)
- System artifact evaluation as
described in 21 CFR 900.12(e)(5)(ix)
- Dose determination as described in 21
CFR 900.12(e)(5)(vi) – if clinical techniques increase
significantly
- Verification of the appropriate
processing solutions as described in 21 CFR 900.12(b)(13)
We also recommend
that the medical physicist conduct the “Darkroom Fog” test if the
integrity of the darkroom is compromised, and to conduct the fixer
retention analysis test, if deemed necessary.
Each processor used clinically must have an MEE, even those at
remote sites (if any).
- For a newly installed or
reassembled laser printer, the medical physicist needs
to follow the applicable FFDM QC manual.
Examples of major changes or repairs that would call for an MEE
include, but are not limited to:
- Replacement of an x-ray tube, collimator,
filter, AEC, or AEC sensor.
- A total overhaul of the processor.
Routine processor preventive maintenance, pump replacement,
replacement of the developer or fixer racks, replacement of the
control board or changes in chemistry brand are not considered to be
major changes or repairs and, consequently, would not require
evaluation by a medical physicist.
These evaluations are used by the facility, its
accreditation body, and the MQSA inspector to determine whether the
new or changed equipment meet the requirements of applicable
standards in 21 CFR 900.12(b) and (e). Consequently, the physicist
should provide the facility with sufficient documentation that
clarifies both the testing performed and the test results. The
medical physicist (after consultation with the FDA, if necessary)
should decide which tests need to be performed following a
particular repair, and should be prepared to explain the rationale
behind his or her decision. Before the new or changed equipment is
put into service for patient examinations or processing mammograms,
the facility must correct all problems relating to the regulations
(21 CFR 900.12(e)(10)). There is no provision for a 30-day
correction period such as with some QC and physics survey test
results.
|